| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PWM device provided by Chrome OS EC doesn't really support anything
other than setting a relative duty cycle. To support it as a backlight,
this patch makes the PWM period optional in the device tree and pretends
the valid brightness range is its period_ns.
Also adds a sandbox test for a PWM channel that has a fixed period,
checking that the resulting duty_cycle matches on a set_config() even if
the requested period_ns can't be set.
Signed-off-by: Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This construct is quite long-winded. In earlier days it made some sense
since auto-allocation was a strange concept. But with driver model now
used pretty universally, we can shorten this to 'auto'. This reduces
verbosity and makes it easier to read.
Coincidentally it also ensures that every declaration is on one line,
thus making dtoc's job easier.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At present this uclass has no tests. Add a simple one which checks the PWM
configuration, regulator and GPIO.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add test case for new interface set_invert().
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Fix typo in subject and build error in sandbox_pwm_set_invert():
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
|
|
Unfortunately a test for the PWM uclass was not included when it was
submitted. This was noticed when trying to add more functionality:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/748172/
Add a simple test to get us started.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
